
p-2
p
with variance
p2, as illustrated below, where
is the mean spatial detail of the scene relative to the spacing of the sampling intervals of the image-gathering process 

of the image-gathering device relative to its sampling passband
, as controlled by the optical-response index
, for maximum information rate
may be based on the assumption that m=3 and
=1, as summarized in the table. Similar plots of
for various values of m, ranging from 1.4 to 4 lead to the selection of
for the available SNR, as would plots of
for various values of
.


This last figure presents the information rate
and the corresponding maximum-realizable fidelity
for matched and mismatched Wiener restorations. The matched restorations use the correct values of m and
. These curves reveal that the informationally optimized designs produce the

highest fidelity and robustness, and that both improve with increasing
. Ordinarily, to assure both a high fidelity and robustness, it is necessary for the SNR to be high, above ~64, so that an information rate 
3 bits/sample can be attained. Moreover, these curves reveal that, ordinarily, one cannot go far wrong by assuming that the mean spatial detail is equal to the sampling intervals (i.e.,
=1). This observation appeals intuitively because spatial detail that is much smaller cannot be resolved, and detail that is larger is not degraded substantially by blurring and aliasing.